The whole world has united demanding Russia’s top officials to free Nadiya Savchenko, subject of the Russian kangaroo court. The diplomats pressure Russia with threats of making sanction lists of persons directly participating in the court proceedings. At the moment the ‘Savchenko List’ has not been approved yet as no actual sentence has been passed, but it seems very likely that the judgment will be announced on March 21 or 22, 2016. Despite all gaps and holes in the prosecution’s line which were repeatedly torn to pieces by the facts presented by Savchenko’s defense, the Russian prosecution demands 23 years in prison for Nadiya.
The so-called ‘Savchenko List’ made by the EU is a copy of the list made by the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc and published as early as on 24.02.2015. However, at that time it consisted of 35 persons while the EU diplomats reduced it to 29 persons including all top leaders with President of Russia Vladimir Putin as No.1. The list is just names and titles which, for the most part, mean nothing to ordinary citizens.
So, the judges in the Savchenko proceedings which were included in the EU preliminary sanction list:
I The first group consists of the Voronezh judges with their notable decisions delivered immediately following Savchenko’s illegal forced transfer to the territory of Russia.
Litovkina, Tatyana Aleksandrovna – judge of the Voronezh Regional Court presiding over the appellate court session on 25.07.2014 in the case of N.V. Savchenko. She dismissed the defense lawyers’ appeal against Savchenko’s arrest till 30.08.2014
Saligov, Magomed Topayevich – judge of the Sovetsky District Court of Voronezh who on 27.08.2014 ruled on extending the detention term till 30.10.2014 and denied changing the restraining order on bail. He also ruled on subjecting N.V.Savchenko to a psychological and psychiatric examination.
Kosenkov, Nikolay Fedorovich – judge of the Voronezh Regional Court. On 15.09.2014 he dismissed the defense lawyers’ appeal against Savchenko’s detention till 30.10.2014.
II They are followed by the Moscow judges with considerable experience and service records who participated in high-profile court proceedings.
Levashova, Valentina Yevgenievna – judge of the Basmanny District Court of Moscow. On 27.10.2014 she extended N.V.Savchenko’s detention till 13.02.2015. On 04.03.2015 she presided over the court session where N.V.Savchenko’s defense lawyers tried to appeal against the denial of her release for participation in the PACE session of January 2015 by investigators of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. The judge dismissed the lawyers’ appeal. She is known as the judge of the ‘Bolotnaya Square Case’ of Ilya Gushchin, Alexander Margolin and Leonid Razvozzhayev. In July 2015 she ruled on arresting Ilya Ponomarev in absentia. Ilya Ponomarev was accused of complicity in misappropriation of the Skolkovo Foundation money but is better known as the only deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation who voted against the annexation of the Crimea.
Karpov, Artur Gennadievich – judge of the Basmanny District Court of Moscow. On 10.02.2015 he extended Savchenko’s arrest till 13.05.2015. Karpov transferred to the judicial system from the military prosecution. He turned up in the infamous ‘YUKOS Case’, and in 2011-2012 also participated in the ‘Magnitsky Case’ where he dismissed several appeals against lack of action by the investigative authorities, in 2012-2013 he participated in the proceedings against the persons detained in the ‘Bolotnaya Square Case’. He will hardly be surprised to find himself in another sanction list.
Mokhov, Andrey Valerievich – judge of the Moscow Municipal Court. On 25.02.2015 he ruled on the dismissal of N.V.Savchenko’s defense lawyers’ appeal against her detention till 13.05.2015. On 12.09.2012 he was in the panel of judges who dismissed the cassation appeal from the arrest of Vladimir Akimenkov connected to the ‘Bolotnaya Square Case’.
The Tymoshenko Bloc limited their list of judges to these names only. However, in March 2015 the court proceedings not only were not finished but even picked up speed involving more and more persons whose data was discovered by the InformNapalm team:
We would like to point out that the Security Service of Ukraine and the Office of General Prosecutor of Ukraine charged judges Karpov, Melekhin and Mushnikova with suspected illegal detention of Savchenko.
In addition to the judges, the Security Service of Ukraine expressed its suspicion to the persons responsible for giving false evidence against N.V.Savchenko.
Investigators included in the EU’s preliminary sanction list together with Manshyn:
On 27.08.2015 the ‘sharks’ of the Russian Themis in the judicial panel upheld the resolution extending Savchenko’s detention.
When the Savchenko proceedings location changed in the summer of 2015, the panel of judges changed as well. The sanction list should be supplemented with these new names:
Kirsanova, Lyudmila Vladimirovna – judge of the Rostov Regional Court. On 04.12.2105 and 25.12.2015 she upheld the resolution extending Savchenko’s arrest till 16.04.2016.
The change of the case geography led to changes in the proceedings reporting. For example, during the court sessions photography and video recording is allowed only in respect of the defense lawyers and Nadiya Savchenko herself. Photographing judges and prosecution is strictly prohibited.
Panel of Donetsk municipal judges of the Rostov region who will pass the final verdict in the Savchenko case:
The EU’s preliminary sanction list does not include the prosecuting attorneys who are afraid to have their faces photographed during the court sessions in Donetsk:
The video made by Russia-24 in the session hall in Rostov-on-Don allowed ‘looking’ them in the eye.
Let’s admit that Nadiya Savchenko is not the only citizen of Ukraine unlawfully held in Russian detention facilities or prisons and that we have to make similar ‘Sentsov List’, ‘Kolchenko List’, etc. But here the error was made by their defense – maximal publicity could have attracted attention to the participants of any proceedings. However, we believe it’s not too late now, and the Ukrainian sanction list can be expanded with the names of those serving the Russian Themis who passed sentences for other Ukrainians. The professional defense team of Nikolay Polozov, Ilya Novikov and Mark Feygin made the Savchenko trial really public, despite the fact that the court sessions were closed. We appeal to the relatives, friends, defense lawyers of the Ukrainian prisoners held in Russian cells for names of judges and prosecutors who brought unsubstantiated charges and made resolutions.
Let us make lists together!
List of Ukrainian political prisoners:
- Nadiya Savchenko, 34, faces 20 to 25 years in prison
- Oleg Sentsov, 39, sentenced to 20 years, place of service unknown
- Oleksandr Kolchenko, 26, sentenced to 10 years, place of service unknown
- Mykola Karpyuk, 51, faces 15 years in prison, detained in Grozny, Chechnya
- Oleksiy Chirniy, 43, sentenced to 7 years, serving in Magadan
- Gennadiy Afanasyev, 25, sentenced to 7 years, serving in Syktyvkar
- Stanislav Klykh, 41, faces 15 years to life, detained in Grozny
- Akhtem Chiygoz, 52, faces up to 15 years in prison, detained in Simferopol
- Oleksandr Kostenko, 29, sentenced to 3 years and 11 months, serving in Kirovo-Cherepovets
- Valentyn Vygovskiy, 32, sentenced to 11 years, serving in Moscow
- Sergiy Litvinov, 32, faces up to 12 years in prison, detained in Rostov-on-Don
- Yuriy Soloshenko, 73, sentenced to 6 years, serving in Nizhniy Novgorod
- Ali Asanov, 33, faces up to 8 years in prison, detained in Simferopol
- Mustafa Degermendzhy, 26, faces up to 8 years in prison, detained in Simferopol
- Nuri Primov, 40, faces up to 10 years in prison, detained in Simferopol
- Rustem Vaitov, 31, faces up to 10 years in prison, detained in Simferopol
- Ferat Saifullayev, 33, faces up to 10 years in prison, detained in Simferopol
- Yuriy Ilchenko, 37, faces up to 20 years in prison, detained in Simferopol
- Kheyser Dzhemilev, 34, sentenced to 3 years and 6 months, serving in Astrakhan
- Viktor Shchur, 58, sentenced to 12 years, serving in Tatarstan
-
Note
Kangaroo court is an English idiom and is often held to give the appearance of a fair and just trial, even though the verdict has in reality already been decided before the trial has begun.
Examples of the ‘kangaroo court’ can be found in many countries.
For example, in Iraq in 1958 in the days of Colonel Abdul Karim Qasim, the court usually lasted 15 minutes and ended with the imposition of the death penalty.
Russell Tribunal, also known as the International War Crimes Tribunal, for the crimes committed in Vietnam is also often called ‘kangaroo court’.
Ken Hood, a columnist of the British newspaper ‘The Guardian’, evaluates trials of prisoners of the US Guantanamo Bay detention camp as a ‘kangaroo court’.
There is a couple of alike idioms in Russia too – ‘Shemyakin court’, and ‘Basmanny justice’ in XXI century.
